PDA

View Full Version : Global Inflation


Maple Leaf Steve
03-27-2005, 07:52 AM
http://www.goldcentral.com/qry/backgroundstories.taf?_function=detail&NEWS_uid1=6234

STAGE IS SET FOR GLOBAL INFLATION
Dr. Richard S. Appel
Email to Friend 21 Mar 2005 Request Free Information

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The U.S. Federal Reserve has aggressively inflated our money supply during the past dozen years. It has performed this act in its effort to stimulate our economy and forestall a potentially damaging period of economic weakness. Prior to this time, and in ever increasing amounts as the years passed, dollar credits have hemorrhaged from our nation. This was largely the result of our unending and expanding balance of payments deficits that were primarily caused by three events: 1. the increased liquidity in our banking system that was generated by the issuance of inflationary purchasing media, 2. the wide-spread availability of enticing, cheap goods offered by our trading partners, and 3.the dollar has depreciated against other currencies which raised the dollar cost of their offered items.

The expatriated U.S. dollars resulting from this massive dollar outflow entered and swelled the central bank coffers of our trading partners. This circumstance has systematically forced foreign countries to increase their own monetary aggregates and threatens to spread inflation around the globe.

The transfer of dollars from the U.S. to other countries resulted in the temporary exportation of inflation from the U.S. to those lands receiving our dollars. If this did not occur and the dollars remained within our monetary system, the U.S. would have already seriously suffered from inflation. Remember, inflation is essentially caused by the over-issuance of purchasing media, in this case dollars. In effect, as the amount of circulating money increases while the quantity of available goods and services remains essentially constant, too many dollars are chasing the same goods, and nominal prices are bid up by supply and demand.

Through a series of banking system transactions, much of the foreign money acquired by a business or individual ultimately winds up in the vaults of their country's central bank. When a central bank receives another nation's money they generate a bookkeeping credit to the domestic depositor's account in the local currency. Further, the central bank normally uses the acquired dollars to purchase U.S. Treasury Paper. This allows them to at least earn interest on the foreign deposits. The newly created local monetary units then enter their banking system and increase the nation's money supply. The end result which may take time to work through the system, is the reduced purchasing power of those monetary units already in existence, and higher domestic prices.

A good example of the effect of the above process was recently highlighted in news emanating from China. As you know China is one of our nation's most important trading partners, and is likely destined to one day lead the list. Their generally low prices have attracted an enormous influx of U.S. dollars as American after American has sought the great bargains produced in their country. While the flood of dollars used to purchase their goods has helped their nation improve both their economy and the state of their citizenry, it has also had a deleterious effect. Quoting a recent New York Times article, "China's inflation rate rose to 2.9 percent in the first two months of the year...The cost of food, which accounts for about a third of the index, rose 8.8 percent in February after climbing 4 percent in January and 2.4 percent in December." Inflation is beginning to emerge there.

The January, $15.3 billion U.S. trade deficit with China was an individual country record. Most of these $15.3 billion dollars will find their way to their central bank which in turn will be compelled to issue new yuan credits to their depositors. Thus, their money supply will be further expanded. The final result will be the stimulation of future across the board price increases for their nation.

I have used China as an example. However, all of the trading partners with which we are in a balance of payments deficit are suffering a similar fate. Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, European Union countries and a host of other nations are also being similarly forced to increase their monetary aggregates, and are thereby threatened with an upset to their domestic pricing structures. This, in order for them to continue doing business with the U.S.

As the United States continues to inflate its money supply, many other countries have taken our lead. Japan, which has yet to extricate itself from its fifteen-year economic malaise, numerous European Community countries, as well as a number of additional states are pursuing a similar tact. Their goal is not only an attempt to similarly stimulate their economies via the printing press, but to also improve their competitive advantage in the world's markets by weakening their respective currencies.

The foreign accumulation of 2+ trillion U.S. dollars combined with the fostered money supply increases by many of our trading partners has damaging consequences. Not only have they been forced to increase their monetary aggregates with each dollar that they acquire, but many are also aggressively expanding their measures of money in order to cheapen their currencies, and thus halt the dollar's decline against their domestic monetary units.

We are beginning to see the first signs of rising global inflation unfold as depicted by China's current experience. Several commodities are already trading near or at all time highs. I believe that this trend is destined to continue and will produce far higher prices for all commodities, as they respond to the enormous issuance of fiat currencies by all of the world's major countries. At some point increasing prices will feed upon themselves. One nation after another will experience higher prices as both the cost of needed commodities and finished products, work their way through their economies.

The hardest hit nation will be the U.S. This will occur because foreign held dollar credits will finally return to our shores. These will swell our already enormous pool of domestic dollars. Foreigners are just beginning to sense that all is not right with the dollar. The first countries are beginning to limit their U.S. dollar holdings. Russia, Malaysia, China, Japan and South Korea have already announced their desire to achieve this goal. Later, a flight from the dollar will occur.

Foreign entities will sell their U.S. treasury securities and will exchange the received dollars for their own currencies. Our bond market will plummet as will the dollar, and inflation will become rampant. Gold and to a lesser extent silver will then act as life boats on a stormy sea. They will save those who recognize their importance, and gold will again return to the limelight as the only true and desirable form of money worth holding.

This series of events will not occur overnight. We likely have a few years or more to prepare. Our government will fight the demise of the dollar and the outbreak of inflation with all of the available methods at their disposal. They will call in all of the favors owed them by other nations, and will twist as many arms as is necessary to coerce the other countries to retain their dollar holdings. In the end they will lose. I for one hope that they will be successful for as many months or years as possible. It will not be a pleasant experience when our dollars finally come home to roost, but the stage is being set for an inflationary storm when they return.

Halophyte
03-27-2005, 01:52 PM
It was almost a decade after the great inflation of the '70's - sparked by Nixon and the break-up of the Brenton Woods trade system, that the effects of monetary inflation finaly hit the PM markert. It was after the real estate market was played out, over inflated and the prime lending rate shot up to slow the fire sale of homes and double digit inflation.

This is what I call a slingshot effect of monetary inflation - PM's are held at bay until the inflation potential of the metals overcomes the forces holding it down.

.

Spacecat
03-27-2005, 04:48 PM
Yes, but they also did not have the internet, do you supose that it will be faster this time?

Halophyte
03-27-2005, 05:16 PM
Panic is faster ...

wulfgar60
03-27-2005, 10:52 PM
I would curious as to the mechanism by which the foriegn earnings are translated back into the local currency. In theory the money is traded into local currency by currency exchange. Most CB's keep an amount of foriegn reserves on their accounts. Now I assume they achieve that by trading their printing on the currency exchange. Hence there is the potential for inflation, that gets exploited.
But the Fed is somewhat different. It's charter is more limited than most CB's. As far as I know, it doesn't hold foriegn currency. Since its product can be used directly on foriegn markets. In effect the Fed prints its own foriegn reserve.

GMB
04-23-2005, 08:17 AM
The only thing I'm not buying from this Appel fellow is the idea that the Americans are forcing others to increase their money supply.

The fact is that a government who shows financial discipline is an oddity. The Swiss used to do so and the West Germans. How many others and for how long? Got nothing to do with the Americans. During the first oil crisis I seem to remember the Japanese being financially disciplined and not having the inflation problems of the English-Speaking World.

Under Carter I can remember inflation rates of about 15% in the US and 17% in NZ or thereabouts. But the Swiss were down at 2% or something similar. The rest of us are sovereign nations. People get carried away with this idea of an American Empire but its really just an analogy. If any one of us non-American countries wants to run a tight ship we can do it. But the understanding of how to do this without suffering a recession isn't there.

Tuxx
04-23-2005, 08:24 AM
Another clueless PhD.

Rising interest raise and crude are recessionary. Not inflationary.

We are headed into a recession - just watch the slower earnings, wage growth and slowing economic reports :wavey: :afraid: :wavey: .

The yield curve is screaming recession!!!!!!!!!

GMB
04-23-2005, 08:44 AM
Yeah its a weird situation isn't it? On the one side you see a weird American yield curve and what looks like a looming crash. But on the other side you think to yourself "won't we just go on printing to avoid the crash".

Your rock solid prediction might be based on what would happen if we ever stopped printing.

Its so odd to me. Its like you have been kicking the can down the road so long and now there just isn't too much room to move.

I don't know. You Americans always seem to get by somehow.

But its like guys who leave studying for finals up until the very last possible moment.

Halophyte
04-23-2005, 12:17 PM
The yield curve is screaming recession!!!!!!!!!


Yup, yield of forward debt makes or brakes the debt backed by debt game. Negative curve means the folks at the treasury are awfully worried. But don't worry, tank the SM a bit and the fools will be back buying bonds. The controlled destruction of the production sector is nearly completed, little potential left to feed the debt inflation monster.

Now it's time to siphon from equities to fund the monetization of funny money.

The creature has a terrible appetite, growing every day.

Too late to stop feeding it ....

Tuxx
04-23-2005, 01:06 PM
Yup, yield of forward debt makes or brakes the debt backed by debt game. Negative curve means the folks at the treasury are awfully worried. But don't worry, tank the SM a bit and the fools will be back buying bonds. The controlled destruction of the production sector is nearly completed, little potential left to feed the debt inflation monster.

Now it's time to siphon from equities to fund the monetization of funny money.

The creature has a terrible appetite, growing every day.

Too late to stop feeding it ....

According to the talking heads - all is well.

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle bgColor=#dcdcdc colSpan=5>U.S. Treasury Bonds</TD></TR><TR><TD>Maturity</TD><TD align=middle>Yield</TD><TD align=middle>Yesterday</TD><TD align=middle>Last Week</TD><TD align=middle>Last Month</TD></TR><TR bgColor=#dcdcdc><TD>3 Month</TD><TD align=middle>2.76 </TD><TD align=middle>2.73 </TD><TD align=middle>2.63 </TD><TD align=middle>2.67 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD>6 Month</TD><TD align=middle>3.00 </TD><TD align=middle>2.99 </TD><TD align=middle>2.95 </TD><TD align=middle>2.99 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#dcdcdc><TD>2 Year</TD><TD align=middle>3.59 </TD><TD align=middle>3.61 </TD><TD align=middle>3.47 </TD><TD align=middle>3.80 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD>3 Year</TD><TD align=middle>3.69 </TD><TD align=middle>3.72 </TD><TD align=middle>3.61 </TD><TD align=middle>4.00 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#dcdcdc><TD>5 Year</TD><TD align=middle>3.91 </TD><TD align=middle>3.95 </TD><TD align=middle>3.86 </TD><TD align=middle>4.27 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD>10 Year</TD><TD align=middle>4.24 </TD><TD align=middle>4.29 </TD><TD align=middle>4.23 </TD><TD align=middle>4.58 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#dcdcdc><TD>30 Year</TD><TD align=middle>4.57 </TD><TD align=middle>4.63 </TD><TD align=middle>4.59 </TD><TD align=middle>4.85 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
If you know anything about economics all is not well.......:stickyman

Good thing the treasury does not issue the 30 year any longer.

wulfgar60
04-28-2005, 05:38 AM
The point were America "forces" other nations to increase their money supply. Is in building the foriegn reserves, the master CB always comes out on top. The house wins rule. Essentially the US receives a certain amount of other nations more solid currencies for free. The US will always win the currency trading game while the greenback is the world reserve.
The greenbacks in the other nations reserves lose value. Meaning these other nations CB print ever more of their own currency to buy greenbacks to top up their reserves. The Fed has no need of foriegn reserves, because it prints the foriegn reserve at any time and in any quantity that serves their own interest.

GMB
04-29-2005, 01:19 PM
No-one forces anyone to buy American Dollars. Thats my main point. The non-Americans have to take some responsibility for themselves.

wulfgar60
04-30-2005, 12:46 AM
http://cracker.com.au/viewthread.aspx?threadid=43640&categoryid=11061

Here's a nice Aussie board, if you don't know them GMB.

As for the greenback. I notice Iraq didn't get occupied within 2 years after switching to the Euro. America was out for Iraq's blood, as soon as it happend!

GMB
04-30-2005, 04:59 AM
I've argued with people on Cracker before. They don't strike me as being too bright.

wulfgar60
04-30-2005, 08:28 AM
Hmmm! I was wondering why I was having such success with Cracker!

56K-for-Life
05-22-2005, 01:32 AM
It all has to do with how inflation is calulated.....

example.....Let's say that gasoline prices have doubled since 1999...Greenspan would say that there is no net change to your cost of energy since your car SHOULD get twice the gas milage....

same thing with imputed cost of renting housing....rents are low since Greenspan is giving away money which causes a lower bias to inflation calulation whether you rent or not.....

Greenspan is of the view that if something costs too much...you will switch to some altenative that costs less and the net effect on your wallet is much less than if you coughed up for what you wanted to start with............

the whole thing is a screw job by your central bakers....

McTeer started this bs and since it effectively devalued the dollar and your savings without anyone noticing..the practice continues....

Greenspan has adopted the view that inflation doesn't exist because you can't afford something and you don't purchase it...you don't notice inflation.....

these people are smoking some killer weed....

of course it's just my opinion and I could be wrong....

Ponce Cuba
05-22-2005, 01:46 AM
Every day the prices for everything is going higher......or at least that's what people think, but in reality is the dollar that is going down in value.

I am really surprised that the power to be have been able to hold down the prices of PM for as long as they have, is ok because that's means a bigger bang for your buck later on.

azxcvbnm321
05-22-2005, 07:24 AM
The only thing I'm not buying from this Appel fellow is the idea that the Americans are forcing others to increase their money supply.

The fact is that a government who shows financial discipline is an oddity. The Swiss used to do so and the West Germans. How many others and for how long? Got nothing to do with the Americans. During the first oil crisis I seem to remember the Japanese being financially disciplined and not having the inflation problems of the English-Speaking World.

Under Carter I can remember inflation rates of about 15% in the US and 17% in NZ or thereabouts. But the Swiss were down at 2% or something similar. The rest of us are sovereign nations. People get carried away with this idea of an American Empire but its really just an analogy. If any one of us non-American countries wants to run a tight ship we can do it. But the understanding of how to do this without suffering a recession isn't there.


The problem is with the liberal socialist ideology outside America and a few other nations. Those countries must run deficits and print money to cover all their social programs. Anytime the growth rate of a program is slowed, you have all the usual whiners complaining about how the poor are being left out on the streets to die.

What you need is more consumption, by not taking as much wealth away from the people, ie. lower taxes. Consumption creates demand and more jobs. All those people who obsess about savings and manufacturing forget that there must be someone to buy what is manufactured, or else the factory goes bankrupt!

Savings rates in Japan continue to be very very high, but that's what's killing their economy. The Japanese government has spent and spent and spent on useless projects instead of giving a big tax cut. Because the people are no more wealthier than before, they continue not to spend and now the government debt is more than 100% over GDP, at dangerous levels.

Fiscal responsibility is unpopular and hard. That's why the US hasn't been able to reduce spending at all. Talking about being responsible is the easy part.

Halophyte
05-22-2005, 06:06 PM
Being responsible about money means the economy tanks ....

Irresponsible means good times ....

Up is down, down is up. Good is bad, bad is good.

Welcome to the world of fiat regimes.