PDA

View Full Version : Why is the Internet not controlled by the authorities?


messianicdruid
01-11-2006, 10:59 PM
Why is the Internet not controlled by the authorities?

Because the internet is a much more effective propaganda tool if the users believe it’s content is of their own creation rather than Public Relations created by the elite. If there are no laws regarding truth or ethics then the elite have free reign to do whatever they desire. As shown in other media and systems such as voting, vast numbers don’t guarantee impartiality or freedom. Those that control the medium control the content. A voice of danger to the elite on the internet can be shut out by a number of well established PR techniques. The average user of the internet is only a target for the elite’s PR and no real threat to them.

I believe there are genuine alternative information portals on the internet but even they inadvertently forward the aims of the elite. Much of PR involves very obscure psychological techniques beyond the scope of this discussion. I will briefly outline one. The intent of much of the elite’s PR is to keep the masses ineffective through inaction. Introducing confusion is a good way to accomplish this. A logical device called a “double bind” is the perfect tool for this. [4]

The theory of schizophrenia presented here is based on communications analysis, and specifically on the Theory of Logical Types. From this theory and from observations of schizophrenic patients is derived a description, and the necessary conditions for, a situation called the 'double bind' - a situation in which no matter what a person does, he 'can't win'. It is hypothesized that a person caught in the double bind may develop schizophrenic symptoms.

The lengthy article quoted in the above paragraph is worth reading to help understand the manipulation that is happening on a massive scale in all media.

Another reason the internet is not regulated is that if people thought the elite controlled the internet they would be more careful about what they say online. As it is it’s a perfect place to identify potential protesters. Looking at the Elite’s track record of respecting the laws regarding privacy elsewhere are you comfortable they are respecting your privacy online?

www.regainyourbrain.org article #187

Halophyte
01-11-2006, 11:04 PM
I believe there are genuine alternative information portals on the internet but even they inadvertently forward the aims of the elite.


Yup pretty soon we'll be stuck telnetting ... prepare to set your CPU clock back 15 years.

.

Ponce Cuba
01-11-2006, 11:08 PM
Give them time......like everything else "the chosen ones" are or will try very hard to take control of it or at "least" try to take out anything that will uncover who they really are.

I don't mind saying that all I have learned about the Jews (Zionists) is thanks to the internet, before this all that I knew about them was the false propaganda in the American media.....which as you know is controlled by them.

GOLD DUCK
01-12-2006, 12:10 AM
QWAK,When I first went on line I had an internet aplience called an I-OPENER I was so impressed with it I invested in the compny called NETPLIENCE. It was an IPO that took in 140 mill off the IPO but they had a HACKER problem they knew about befor the IPO was even launched. They LIVED BIG TIME for a year and burned threw over 100 mill! the stock went to $26.00+ shortly after the IPO but down to about $.32 by the end of 18 mo. and the CREEPS tried to BUY out the small investors at $.68 with less than 1/2 the remaing cash put up by small investors who bought at MUCH higher prices on the open market.

Yahoo had a board for NPLI and we were like a big family there. I made a statment that the I-Opener was like the Colt 45 in the old west IT made ALL people EQUAL and that IF they hunted THIS DUCK that THIS DUCK HUNTED BACK!

When the company tried to pull a FAST BUY OUT of the small investors over the christmas holidays I contacted a LAWYER over the inter net and filed a CLASS ACTION SUIT blocking the buy out!

IN less than 24 hours of filing ,the company cut off my access to the internet and in about 5 days I was contacted by the FBI and so was YAHOO! The Yahoo board was SHUT DOWN and WIPED cleen of ALL posts! The company had ACCUSED ME of TERRORISTIC THRETINING over the internet!

It shut me up long enough for them to regroup and come up with an alternet plan. BOTTOM LINE they got to keep all the money and the investors,customers and emploies ALL GOT SCREWED!

2 years later after changing the name of the company and coming up with a totaly diferent product that was BS BOGUS,the company was bought by another company who could use the 100 mill LOSE as a TAX SHELTER!

TRUE STORY PEOPLE! The FBI was DOOPED and the BAD GUYS WON!

the DUCK

SilverNuts@Bolts
01-12-2006, 12:23 AM
Go to China and see for yourself, how the internet is controled, by the government.

lr777g62d
01-12-2006, 01:32 AM
Another reason the internet is not regulated is that if people thought the elite controlled the internet they would be more careful about what they say online. As it is it’s a perfect place to identify potential protesters. Looking at the Elite’s track record of respecting the laws regarding privacy elsewhere are you comfortable they are respecting your privacy online?


Yes, "they" are watching and taking notes. No surprise here. :wavey:

Spacecat
01-12-2006, 01:56 AM
China's new online police warn: 'Internet is not beyond the law'

Wednesday, January 11, 2006



China's government has initiated the first police force designed to monitor the Internet. Authorities in Shenzhen said the police force began Jan. 1 and will monitor “everything that is said in online forums,” the Hong Kong Ming Pao reportedThe Shenzhen police said in announcing the new force that the “Internet is not beyond the law“ and that Chinese should strictly regulate their online behavior.

China is cultivating high-technology specialists from around the world to develop expertise to control content on the Internet, which China's communist leaders view as a threat to their control over the country.
The Shenzhen Internet police have stated that websites and online forums are no longer outside the control of law enforcement, including public security agencies, urban administration and civil administration authorities. The police use floating computer icons that appear on Internet sites to notify computer users that they are being monitored


http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/06/front2453747.111111111.html

Ponce Cuba
01-12-2006, 02:12 AM
Go to China and see for yourself, how the internet is controled, by the government.

Hell go to Cuba, there is no internet.....only computers that goes in a close circle.

keehah
01-12-2006, 03:24 PM
Why control the internet when you can control Google?

24th May 2005 -The company that prides itself on "Doing No Evil" isn't taking any chances with its latest executive appointment. Dan Senor, the company's new Global Communications and Strategy VP.

A former Senior Associate at the Carlyle Group, Senor was briefly Scott McLellan's deputy as White House spokesman before becoming head of the the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq's information department.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/24/google_neocon/ http://oldamericancentury.org/bb/index.php?showtopic=3130&st=0&#entry18426

PatColo
01-12-2006, 04:03 PM
"they" are working on controlling the internetS (as dubya says)

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Palladium+Microsoft&btnG=Google+Search

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/september2004/120904securitybuffer.htm

I do find it ironic that the internets was "invented" by DoD... when, in this brief time frame when the internets were free like the Wild Wild West, I've done all my "waking up"... to THEIR evil. It'll be fascinating to see how "official history" tells the story of these fleeting years in time when the internets was still free.

messianicdruid
01-15-2006, 11:18 PM
Still, one thing that appears to be indisputable is that the NSA surveillance began well before 9/11 and months before President Bush claims Congress gave him the power to use military force against terrorist threats, which Bush says is why he believed he had the legal right to bypass the judicial process.

According to the online magazine Slate, an unnamed official in the telecom industry said NSA's "efforts to obtain call details go back to early 2001, predating the 9/11 attacks and the president's now celebrated secret executive order. The source reports that the NSA approached U.S. carriers and asked for their cooperation in a 'data-mining' operation, which might eventually cull 'millions'

www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011306Z.shtml

honu5050
01-15-2006, 11:54 PM
well its back to homing pidgins.

GREENSILVERHORN
01-26-2006, 02:39 AM
well its back to homing pidgins.

If we had to tie little notes to thier legs I'm sure i would never understand you writing let alone your spelling:aetsch:

Seriously though if G.I.M. is ever accosted like the Duck was above I hope Khan would put us all in contact with one another.

Kahn do we have a successful exit statedgy for our exploits?

Keef
01-26-2006, 06:26 AM
Why no control? So TPTB can identify the 'bad guys'

Pretty soon every member of this forum will have a '666-GIM' licence plate and we will be wondering how they found our gold so easy?

mu-tiger
01-26-2006, 09:25 AM
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-277.ZS.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/01/bush_net_policy/

Driver A
02-02-2006, 05:36 AM
I wonder if Bill Gates owns the internet and maybe don`t let them censor it. Just a guess

Ash_Williams
02-05-2006, 09:51 AM
Here's a really small article about google's search being censored based on a country's preference:

http://www.sethf.com/anticensorware/general/google-censorship.php

Also read up on section 2257, how it's justified, and how they are actually using it.

J.D.Rockinfeller
02-07-2006, 12:31 AM
Maybe, this is just the information gathering phase .....you surf..."they" watch.....then "they" will know who is who before taking action.....
or is that rediculously paranoid???:thrasher: .........

honu5050
02-07-2006, 04:28 AM
99Maybe, this is just the information gathering phase .....you surf..."they" watch.....then "they" will know who is who before taking action.....
or is that rediculously paranoid???:thrasher: .........#9 #9 #9 # 9 etc.:listen: to the first amendant the orignal Issue. :musicus:

azxcvbnm321
02-07-2006, 05:30 AM
The internet can't be controlled because it's just too large and hard. It's like trying to stop a group of friends from talking about the government in their own homes, only now they can record what they say and upload it on the internet. Or hold a conference call with hundreds of others gathered at different places. How is anyone going to stop this conference call, or stop someone from downloading the podcast? They'll have to be at that person's house, and there aren't enough government agents to physically watch over every person 24/7.
e, o
There are also forums, and blogs like mine www.impleader.com and as long as free speech laws exists, people can now publish their views and have millions read what they have to say. Befornly elites and those in the media could get their ideas out to the masses, thanks to the internet, everyone can.

honu5050
02-07-2006, 05:49 AM
probaly the dam Ironie of this is TPTB will think tank this together and years from now modify their tatics .the stasi reached about 50%, one on one but the sh*t got old and this will too. sooner da better! they have to make it subtle and kike a bad meal it will come up again.mabey not.:thinkey:

GoldWampum
02-07-2006, 07:08 AM
Speech is not free. The bill just hasn't showed up in the mail yet.