PDA

View Full Version : Russian military intel report: March 22 UPDATE


BarnacleBob
03-23-2003, 11:50 AM
http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=454

March 22, 2002, 1300hrs MSK (GMT +3), Moscow - Additional information about the situation in the primary combat areas in southern Iraq became available by 1300hrs (Moscow time, GMT +3). The US command reports about the supposed surrender of the entire Iraqi 51st Infantry Division turned out to be a complete fabrication. According to our sources the 51st Division continues to fight on the approaches to Basra and we can only talk about individual cases of Iraqi soldiers being captured in combat.

Elements of the US 3rd Infantry Division and the 1st Marine Infantry Division ended up in an exceptionally difficult situation. While attempting to encircle Basra from the north and to block An-Nasiriya? elements the 3rd and 1st infantry divisions found themselves wedged between the defending Iraqi forces. The Iraqi command used this situation and delivered a decisive counterattack with up to 80 tanks in the open flank of the US forces, slicing through their combat orders. As the result of this counterattack these US units are now at risk of being separated from the main coalition forces and being surrounded.

By 1100hrs MSK Iraqi units advanced into the US attack front by 10-15 kilometers and Gen. Tommy Franks, the commander of the coalition forces, ordered his troops to switch entirely to defensive operations. At the same time he issued orders to the forward-deployed coalition tank units to halt their reconnaissance operations in the directions of Es-Samaba? and An-Najaf? and to move immediately to support the defending US forces. However, the situation is complicated by the fact that a part of the coalition tanks are currently disabled due to the lack of fuel and are awaiting the arrival of fuel convoys. Thus the tanks are able to gradually rejoin combat in small numbers as the fuel becomes available.

Currently the US and the Iraqi tank forces are engaged in mobile head-on combat approximately 70-90 kilometers to the south of An-Nasiriya?. Combat orders have been received by the carrier borne aviation in the Persian Gulf, which until now did not take part in this battle. At the same time orders were issued to all available coalition strike aircraft in Qatar to scramble in support of the defending coalition forces.

Intercepted radio communications indicate that during the morning period of March 22 the US forces lost 10-15 tanks destroyed or disabled and up to 30 other armored vehicles. Medevac helicopters flew more than 30 search-and-rescue missions, which suggests heavy coalition losses.

Our sources report that during the early morning hours in southwestern Iraq in the vicinity of Akashat the Iraqi forces have engaged and surrounded a tactical paratroop unit of the 101st Airborne Division. Some of the surrounded paratroopers were able to break out into the desert, where they request air support and finally lost their Iraqi pursuers. However, up to 30 US troops were killed or captured in this engagement. Additionally, Russian radio intercept units report that one the US attack helicopters providing close air support was shot down.

The top US military command is planning to enhance the coalition command. During the Joint Chief of Staff meeting its Chairman Gen. Richard Mayers expressed strong criticism of the actions by the coalition commander Gen. Franks and proposed to strengthen his headquarters with several other senior military commanders. Gen. Franks is required to do everything he can to change the current situation on the front. Analysts believe that, if during the next 3-5 days Gen. Franks fails to achieve any significant results, than it is entirely possible that he will be replaced as the commander of the coalition forces.

BarnacleBob
03-23-2003, 11:53 AM
Al-Jazeera:American forces acknowledge stiff resistance

Meanwhile the Iraqi Information Minister, Muhammad Sa`id as-Sahhaf, has described as “pure propaganda” what the Americans and British are saying about having achieved victories in the various areas they have passed through. Al-Sahhaf said that everything that has been said about Umm Qasr and other cities is not true, and he declared that the Iraqi forces in positions on al-Faw peninsula, and in Umm Qasr, al-Nasiriyya, Umm al-Shaykh, al-Bateha, and Qa`idat al-Imam `Ali are still strongly resisting. They have inflicted casualties in the ranks of the enemy, and enemy forces have been forced to withdraw from some positions.

Meanwhile, violent battles are raging between the invading forces and the Iraqi military west of the city of al-Basra. Captain Andrew Berger of the US Marines said American tanks are now waging a major battle with Iraqi forces on the western outskirts of al-Basra. In remarks to journalists he added “I can say that it is a major battle.” A British spokesman in al-Sayliya Base in Doha, Qatar, said that the forces led by the United States are trying to negotiate the "surrender of al-Basra."

http://english.pravda.ru/war/2003/03/23/44872.html

BarnacleBob
03-23-2003, 11:56 AM
Iraq Becomes Basis of “Resistance Mechanism”

Today we cannot speak about the break-up of Saddam’s regime and about future prospects of post-Saddam Iraq. Professional experts are inclined to believe that due to US’s scandalous policy that is practically the same as the international banditism, Saddam Hussein managed to perform political expansion far beyond the limits of the Mideast region. Thanks to his efforts, Iraq has been practically turned into the power of resistance to the mechanism of “de-soveregnization” imposed by the United States.

That is why, no matter if the incumbent Iraqi leader will be alive or dead tomorrow, the platform of resistance he has formed is successfully employed by the majority of the world community; the community that is closing the ranks against the background of “new anti-Americanism”. Besides, Saddam Hussein managed to obtain support of the moderate opposition. The opposition includes a group headed by Adnan al-Pachachi, former foreign minister of Iraq, and a group consisting of former Ba’ath and Naserite followers, the political debris who dropped out of the range because of ideological discrepancies or scandals inside the structure.

Both groups categorically reject the American scenario for post-war situation in Iraq and stand up for strict national positions. According to the recent information, Saddam Hussein informed leaders of these groups that the domestic political situation might change in their favor and got a favorable reply from the groups.

http://english.pravda.ru/war/2003/03/22/44869.html

IrishGold
03-23-2003, 01:22 PM
Do you not think it is quite probable that Pravda is as slanted one way as is our press is in the other?

If so, why is this to be believed, any more than CNN, NBC, CBS or FOX?

BarnacleBob
03-23-2003, 01:59 PM
@IrishGold

Yes, I do consider Pravda to be slanted, however much of the info they are producing is also confirmed by numerous foreign medias.

Our media is telling us basically nothing, and when they do, the info is so corrupted that one need not listen to it! JMO

I am going to break out the Short Wave in a few minutes seeking some real news if there is any such thing.......

Pray for our troops, this is going to get very ugly.......

Refugees say they didn't want to leave Iraq

In front of the TV cameras, these people say they didn't ask to be saved from Saddam Hussein and they didn't want to leave Iraq. "Americans are the ones trying to hurt us," said Ramaza.

Aid workers in Jordan say not a single Iraqi citizen has turned up at the camps and no one is quite sure why.

http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/03/21/refugees030321

So much for the "Liberation of Iraq," the majority of Iraqi Citizens do not seek regime change.

and........

It is being reported that Muslims fighters are now pouring into Iraq to fight the US/UK forces.....

Muslim world reforming - the wrong way

The Arab-language al-Jazeera TV network showed footage last week of "dozens" of Arab volunteers flocking to Baghdad to fight against the US-led invasion - a development last seen when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in the late 1970s.

In other Arab and Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Indonesia and Malaysia - all US allies - usually docile, semi-official Islamic scholars have been racing to issue fatwas, religious rulings, condemning the US attack and saying it is an individual duty of every Muslim to fight "the invaders".

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EC22Ak05.html