PDA

View Full Version : Charlie Miller - For those interested in setting up a Republic ...


Halophyte
11-13-2006, 12:07 PM
.... I will never back off, I will never quit, and I pledge my life, my fortune and my sacred honor to the re-establishment of the republic, for anyone who chooses to live there ...

- Charlie Miller


http://www.sendnomoney.com/Sound/061105-Bryant_CharlieM.mp3


.

Halophyte
11-13-2006, 12:19 PM
Marcia-Ann: Willardson
Charles-C.: Miller
c/o: 1105 Terminal Way, Suite 202
Reno [89502]
Nevada
Phone (775) 329-5580
Fax (775) 329-5575
[ DHL 53549085144 ]
Security Registration Number

The One Supreme Court of the United States
Original Venue, Original Jurisdiction
The Superior Court
Washington city.

Original Action No.: ______________________________
IN RE: The People of the United States of America Republic;
Ex Rel: Marcia-Ann: Willardson COMPLAINT
Charles-C.: Miller
For: Tobin-Charles: Masterson-Miller Rule 17 Contract for; Rule 20 Relief,
Steven-Paul: Jensen Habeas Corpus,
Philip-Nicholas: Maniatis Declaration of Citizenship,
Lewis-Vincent: Hughes Quo Warranto; with Bond and
John-Peter: Yunka Indemnity in form of Injunction,
Eugene-Joseph: Koziol Duly registered Enforcement Contract
Chad-Leron: Merica
Kevin-James: Crockett
James-George: Capadona
v.

SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, in capacity of
ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, Respondeat Superior;
To/For
STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF ARIZONA;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF
COLORADO; STATE OF WASHINGTON;
STATE OF UTAH; Operators Does 1-99,999;
NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS;
TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS,
DISTRICT OF NEVADA, ARIZONA,
CALIFORNIA, WASHINGTON, UTAH,
COLORADO; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
OFFICES, DISTRICT OF NEVADA, ARIZONA,
CALIFORNIA, WASHINGTON, UTAH
COLORADO; Operators Does 1-99,999;
UNITED STATES EXECUTIVE
BRANCH OFFICERS OPERATING WITHOUT
FEDERAL VENUE; Does 1-99,999; Does will be named upon discovery.

COMPLAINT

[1] Relators, Marcia-Ann: Willardson, and Charles-C.: Miller, in full capacity, with standing of Public Ministers on and in the Republics entitled The United States of America, under Confederation acting as Trustees for the People and the Republics; accept the open general offer published by the Supreme Court of the United States, its officers, agents, assigns and instrumentalities, for the providing of enforcement on contract, the Original Venues and Original Jurisdictions, Common Law, Equity under purchase contract, maritime and admiralty services and goods for enforcement on promised performance. The issuing under seal of the attached Writs of Habeas Corpus, Admission of Citizenship, and Writ of Quo Warranto in the form of Injunction pursuant to Federal Civil Rule of Procedure 81 as moved under Supreme Court Rules 17 and 20. See Attachments 1, and 2 and 3.

[2] Statement of Jurisdiction founded upon Foreign Sovereign Immunity;
Bailment of Relators and those for whom Habeas Corpus is brought Ex Rel all have bailment foreign to the United States. All states recognize the People as Sovereign. Relators, having first possessed full capacity to remove bailment from United States and place with the United States of America Republic, thus having standing as The People of the United States of America Republic to bring an action of Original Venue and Original Jurisdiction to the Supreme Court of the united States of America Republic;

[3] Statement of Jurisdiction founded upon diversity of citizenship and amount.

A. The People, ex rel, are Citizens of the Republic States in Union, Nevada, California, Washington, Utah, Colorado, Arizona and defendants are corporations or other artificial entities constructed under the laws of the UNITED STATES federal corporation each having Federal Employer Identification numbers for use in Foreign Trade Zones, in commerce, having their principal places of business in a place other than the Republic States in Union.

B. The matters in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum of one million dollars.

[4] Statement of Jurisdiction founded upon the existence of a Constitutional question:

A. The action arises under the Constitution of the United States, Article VI, section 2 and 3; Article III Section 2 and 3, Article I Section 8, Clause 3 and 17; the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, Sections I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X; various Acts of Congress and Treaties, as hereinafter and herewith more fully appears.

[5] GENERAL ALLEGATION(S)

A. Relators, joint and several, state the following declarations as true, correct, not intended to mislead, of first hand personal knowledge, stated under the pains and penalties of perjury according to the laws of Our Venue, unless stated upon belief, which is drawn from the publicly published statements governing conduct of agents and instrumentalities of those superior to the defendants which are duly and unqualifiedly accepted as standards governing acts or omissions of Respondent(s).

[6] Each Relator and each one of the People has at one time or another been intentionally misidentified by Respondents and their agents in that each one of the People is a natural, sentient self recognized Being, possessing full unhindered will and a voice to speak said will and who live on the Land in a Republic, the United States of America as composed of individual states in full unlimited political capacity in service to their Contributing Beneficiaries. Each Relator and Petitioner was, and is, assumed by Respondeat Superior and its agents to be an artificial person, a construction of Respondeat Superior, as an undisclosed real party in interest said assumption based upon undisclosed or no evidence, or even a valid claim that the real flesh and blood of the People are the same as those of artificial persons, being of record, no statement indemnifying the Contributing Beneficiaries being of record, public or private, denying Relators or / and Contributing Beneficiaries of knowledge, notice and opportunity to respond.

[7] For the record, no Relator or one of the People for whom this Habeas Corpus is brought, ex rel or otherwise was voluntarily before Respondeat Superior or these agent actors. The People are victims of criminal acts. The crime is unlawful seizure of the bodies of the People and compelled mental, emotional, physical distress and unbalance enforced by Respondents and / or their cohorts through the use and threatened use of physical and legal coercion for the People to serve those who seized them. The Respondents use for Respondents’ private gain and benefit, constitutes the taking of value where none was given by Respondents. This is the crime of involuntary servitude perfected when Respondents intentionally refused to disclose their authorities or legal right so to act upon and against the People. No criminal act can give or establish jurisdiction in any manner upon which any court or judge or any Respondent herein named or unnamed, acting in office or color of same, could act, except to release the victim, your People ex rel, and expel them from Respondents presence, which is the Respondents absolute duty and which Respondent has failed to date to execute, even upon notice.

[8] To exercise pretend jurisdiction over a victim of a crime is a fraud. Respondents, joint and several, hold the positive, absolute duty to disclose to those they exercise powers over all exculpatory evidence, the powers they claim to act for or under, that is within reach of the Respondent as each is subject of this principal and enforcement statement issued prior by this Court which Respondeat Superior, with agents, intentionally failed to perform for reason of personal private gain and benefit, wherein each individual officer, agent, assign, employee, servant or attorney acting under Respondeat Superior’s payment for services knowingly placed themselves outside protection of the function each serves. Respondents who fail to act in accord with this courts declarations commit the crime of contempt, open, notorious, and willful, when Respondents are creatures of the law operated by individuals usurping powers held by Respondents. These paid professionals hold higher duty, higher knowledge and act in public trust. Deliberate, willful and intentional breach of Peace under higher duty, higher knowledge of the paid professional, having no excuse whatsoever for failing to act under this courts orders or statements of policy is breach of not only personal obligations, Article VI, § 2 and 3, Constitution of the United States, but also treaties mandated under § 1. Injury thereby results not only to the People of the United States of America Republic but also treaty partners, as well.

[9] Respondeat Superior’s exercise, direct or proximate, via agents, Does 1-1,000,000, without disclosure of facts or evidence favorable to the People defrauds the People and the victims of their Liberty, effects and constitutes an exercise of ownership that imposes slavery, a crime and a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. This court has clearly established that involuntary servitude is prohibited which is shown by Respondents operations under purported government identification document administered under intent to prevent or restrict, without lawful authority, Relators and the People’s Liberty to move or travel in their Original Jurisdictions and Original Venues in order to maintain their ownership of labor or services, private personal property, Respondents unlawfully hold Relators and the People to service under these false identification documents which results in the People becoming victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons.
[10] I, Marcia-Ann: Willardson, and I, Charles-C: Miller, ex rel for Petitioners, have recently discovered that each have been a Contributing Beneficiary to the United States Federal Corporation through its constructed entity, a corporation entitled MARCIA ANN WILLARDSON and CHARLES C MILLER, respectively, which carries certain identifiers and agreements with the commercial for profit Federal corporation. This new information has been obtained, through due diligence, from sources of integrity, the open, general, notorious statements issued for reliance by the United States, its instrumentalities, and agents, which promise discharge of duties on certified claims. Notice of obligations is duly accepted as and for value owed by The United States, its instrumentalities and agents. The corporations MARCIA ANN WILLARDSON and CHARLES C MILLER as administered by the Federal Corporation United States, through its agents, resulted in a trust relationship on the acts of the administrators attaching Relators and the People through its constructed entities. Our labor, a private property, has been taken as value, converted to a fungible, to support the operations of The Federal Corporation in it’s for profit business operations within its private trade zones. This transfer thru the corporate entities constructed are to be returned as value in the form of discharge on duties or liabilities owed under the assumed, never disclosed contract between franchiser The United States and its constructed entities. The discharge owed by each and every agent or instrumentality operating under Federal Employee Identification Number is callable by Contributing Beneficiaries due to the fact of prior contributions taken. It matters not whether the contributions were voluntary under full disclosure, or involuntary acts. The fact is they were accepted which then creates the obligation on the acceptor to reimburse on demand, inclusive of all agents and instrumentalities administrative acts as stated in published open offers. The facts are that the flesh and blood Beings on the Land, the People, have been attacked through the legal process, prima facia of law, The United States Code, and State equivalents, the body has been attached on authority of incomplete process as the attached documents, exhibits, show conclusively. The Office of Alien Property Custodian, its agent HENRY M. PAULSON JR. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY has had notice of facts requiring action, release of the body being held without disclosure of authority and has filed to justly administer claimed powers;

[11] Respondeat Superior, failing in duty to supervise agents or instrumentalities effects a servitude of undisclosed and involuntary nature in constitutionally impermissible application of statutes, regulations, rules, with or by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion. These acts result in the imposition of involuntary servitude, a crime which can not thereby invoke jurisdiction or powers of any Respondent, their agent(s) or instrumentalities, which, when used to further punish the victim of the crime, is a breach of Peace, trespass on the case, trespass upon not only the Realtors and the People but also upon the Original Law that Respondeat Superior administers in corporate form. This is also a Breach of the Peace and Dignity of the People, a crime against humanity and contempt for the People’s agency, the United States, no matter who administers its powers under whatever form or forum.

[12] The assumption by Respondents without fact or evidence that Relators or the People, joint or several, are artificial persons, pieces of paper, is an intentional fraud and intentional misidentification. No piece of paper has a voice as the People do. Respondents, joint and several, know that an artificial person is incapable of committing a crime, any crime, as it has no intent, can do no wrong. The UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF UTAH nor any other Respondent entity is incapable of committing a crime which is proven by this Court’s prior declarations. However, the agents, Does 1-1,000,000 can commit a crime for them, at their employer’s behest, and in their employer’s name. Wherefore, this Complaint is processed through this Honorable Court for enforcement of the original, never altered contract constructing the Respondeat Superior and the agency Respondents currently administering power held in trust via current commercial administration systems founded upon false identification documents referenced above, which when not openly voluntarily disclosed works an involuntary servitude by denying the knowledge of same effectively obstructing access to claims, disclosed or undisclosed to which Contributing Beneficiaries could respond.

[13] Agents opportunity to respond for Respondeat Superior, under consideration, in effect orders, are acts without the confines of their claimed powers, the Constitution, the Statutes, the Treaties administered under the United States Code. When executive branch agents are authorized to act without the venue limits established under Original Federal Venue established by Original Jurisdiction, the Federal Constitution, same perfected in / by administrative statements of code under limits defined, 28 USC § 501, perfects the crime of trespass and trespass on the case, absent authorization by Congress, 4 USC § 72, being disclosed to Contributing Beneficiaries authorities for US Department of Justice to act for any party other than The United States, whereby STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF UTAH; NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS; TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS, DISTRICT OF NEVADA, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, WASHINGTON, UTAH; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICES, DISTRICT OF NEVADA, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, WASHINGTON, UTAH; UNITED STATES EXECUTIVE BRANCH OFFICERS OPERATING WITHOUT FEDERAL VENUE each operate on and in the Republic, which recognizes such trespass upon Venue and the People therein for the conversion of benefits to themselves, a conspiracy to mislead, defraud and indenture your Relators, Petitioners herein.

[14] Respondents, in conspiracy to defraud, state reliance upon individual judges statements moving over the Original Jurisdiction. Operating under judge’s statements as if they were or are law in contemplation of willful refusal to disclose all relevant material facts that could be benefit to Contributing Beneficiaries in Respondents joint and several relations to or with these Respondents is crime of contempt to Constitution, Treaty and Statute. Servitude is perfected, proved by the records constructed by Respondents as any common man would recognize. Absence of disclosure is intent to hold Relators and the People to slavery, deny opportunity to respond or to know the service to which Contributing Beneficiaries are being held. Intent to injure, harm, for private or public gain and benefit is shown conclusively by intentional misidentification of the People, each a Contributing Beneficiary, when positive duty to produce verified claim, contract, or title to bodies, capacity, or personality of your Relators and Petitioners, ex rel, is not of record; whereby Respondents act in conspiracy to defraud not only their targets, your Relators and those for whom your Relators petition ex rel, but the Trust they promise to serve, the Original Jurisdiction beginning July 4, 1776 under Declaration inclusive of Trust established under Executive Order 100 along with its current administering form and forum.

GENERAL RELIEF

[15] Relators’ conviction as Contributing Beneficiary, is that all other relief has been foreclosed by Respondeat Superior and Respondents with co-parties are wagering that the People will be unable to find an honest judge or honest court and that the record moved to this Court provides evidence supporting Contributing Beneficiaries’ conviction herein and herewith;

[16] Relators, in capacity of Contributing Beneficiaries, acting for Trust of The Republics, issue the following Judgment Note on all actors under cover or color of law administered by Respondents WITHOUT GRACE for value received. The promise to pay, the performance under contract, with seal, the indorsement, on employment contract, is called AS DUE;

And, to secure payment on duties owed, We hereby authorize, irrevocably, any agent of the Supreme Court of The United States to act for Us in the matters herein and herewith, in term time or vacation, at any time hereinafter, and confess a judgment without process, in favor of holders of The Original Note, the Constitution of the United States Republic, and its component states in Original Union, your Contributing Beneficiaries, Relators and Petitioners; and at this time reserving same to any other American inhabitant on the Land, in peaceful noncombatant capacity(ies), and, Relators consent to immediate execution upon all Respondents, their agents, assigns, employees, servants and attorneys under Original Jurisdiction set out for Judicial Power by Constitution of this Court;

[17] Relators and Petitioners ex rel call for execution in that certain contract, the bailment of powers between Relators, Petitioners and the People of the Republics and the Constitutions, same Judicially Noticed herein and herewith. Acknowledgment on the file by all parties having relations through Constitutional power is approved and agreed for the institution and prosecution of this suit upon all Repondents as fiduciaries prepaid by value taken and received for and on behalf of Contributing Beneficiaries, with respect to Contributing Beneficiaries right, title and interest in and to the property, the Common Law and Equity Law, subject to this contract for performance. The Relators and vendors, this Honorable Court, expressly agree that Contributing Beneficiaries are the due, owed, and may make call on duties owed by Respondents for entitlement to:

a) Redress of Grievance against the government never to be impaired;

b) Production of Affidavit of Probable cause supported by Affidavit under Oath or Affirmation disclosing injured party, legal or equitable relationship, capacity of affiant;

c) Notice of all relevant, material facts that could be of benefit to any Contributing Beneficiary guaranteeing opportunity to respond, with fair and just process forum in which to act;

d) Notice of venue established under documents of title showing ownership of all properties; disclosure of jurisdiction to operate on specific venues; choice of assistance without BAR UNION impairments compulsory process for obtaining non disclosed information or witnesses in support; impartial jury of the State Republican form;

e) Absence of the cruelty of being held to answer to claims, issues or charges not fully disclosed;

f) Recognition of powers reserved to Contributing Beneficiaries and adequate execution to protect equitable right, title and interest in and to the Original Jurisdiction;

g) The protection of the states from trespass by any party and protection from usurpation by the states.
Which is enforcement of equitable right, title and interest held by Contributing Beneficiaries, your Relators and Petitioners, ex rel;

[18] All files of any nature or kind in possession of or accessible by Respondents which could be used against your Relators or Petitioners, ex rel, in any manner are to be removed to this Court under Clerk’s Subpoena for full judicial power review, and made accessible to Relators and Petitioners, action numbers cited herewith;

[19] Respondent executive officers are to be ordered to cease and desist, in any and all manners, any actions in contemplation or effect to your Relators and Petitioners, ex rel;

[20] Recognition declaration of admission by this Court is to be issued for each Relator or Petitioner stipulating to Relators and Petitioners admitting themselves to the Original Jurisdiction, the Republic form, on Original Venue, whereby Citizenship foreign to The United States is recognized under national and international agency, The United States of America Republic;

[21] The unqualified indorsement of the Writs of Habeas Corpus herewith issued as applied for the name individual Petitioners ex rel;

[22] Writ of Quo Warranto in nature of Show Cause Order to Respondents for production of any and all verified claims, contracts, or obligations that could be held against your Relators and Petitioners, ex rel, and all Respondents enjoined permanently from all act in contemplation or effect upon Contributing Beneficiaries, your Relators and Petitioners, pending full review of such disclosure to Petitioners and Relators;

[22] Damages in the amount of Twenty-One Silver Dollars, paid to each Petitioner and each Relator as security for access to the Political Jurisdiction of choice which is to be paid by each Respondent and named individual herein and herewith pending administrative determination of other damages to your Relators ad Petitioners all rights reserved;

PARTICULAR RELIEF

[23] Relator, Marcia-Ann: Willardson, is held to standard of War Powers as a belligerent combatant and enemy of the United States for which there is no evidence. Relator, Marcia-Ann: Willardson demands Writ of Habeas Corpus to issue to custodian, The Office of the President of the United States, for the res, the Original Jurisdiction and the Original Venue of Common Law, Equity, Maritime and Admiralty expressed in Original sealed document entitled The Constitution for the United States of America, its predecessors and controlling components, the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, the Articles of Confederation, its Northwest Ordinance, to be produced in their full bodies before this Court for a judicial power determination of whether each agent serving these powers will be held to the strict standards originally required to be executed by officials of integrity, high moral caliber acting in good behavior; and, Custodian failing to show his cause to believe that Marcia-Ann: Willardson is or could be a belligerent combatant effects release of Marcia-Ann from all impairments of belligerent status;

[23] Relator Charles-C.: Miller is held restrained of liberty under case number CR 97-51C, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, held to John C. Coughenour’s order which is in conflict with sentencing statutes. Coughenour’s order to supervised release impairment on Liberty is in direct conflict with the sentencing statutes authorizing only fine, probation, OR imprisonment. General allegations above and general relief are applied to Relator Charles-C.: Miller as mandatory benefit due any Contributing Beneficiary. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, a division of Respondent UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA, has failed upon demand to disclose why court officers fail to execute the statute as written on mere judge’s illegal order. Relator, Charles-C.: Miller, is held to standard of War Powers as a belligerent combatant and enemy of the United States for which there is no evidence. Relator, Charles-C: Miller demands Writ of Habeas Corpus to issue to custodian, The Office of the President of the United States, for the res, the Original Jurisdiction and the Original Venue of Common Law, Equity, Maritime and Admiralty expressed in Original sealed document entitled The Constitution for the United States of America, its predecessors and controlling components, the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, the Articles of Confederation, its Northwest Ordinance, to be produced in their full bodies before this Court for a judicial power determination of whether each agent serving these powers will be held to the strict standards originally required to be executed by officials of integrity, high moral caliber acting in good behavior; and, Custodian failing to show his cause to believe that Charles-C.: Miller is or could be a belligerent combatant effects release of Charles-C. from all impairments of belligerent status;;

[24] Relators, Marcia-Ann: Willardson and Charles-C.: Miller invoke the powers and duties expressed through the TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT found at Title 50 Appendix, United States Code, Section 1-6, 7-39, 44-44, 40 Stat 411, in particular Section 7(e) and 16, found at administrators Code of Federal Regulations, Title 31, Section 501 for priority process, for order by this Court to Office of the President of the United States and Office of Treasurer of the United States in capacity of Alien Property Custodians as enforced under Army Field Manual 27-10 pursuant to the Hague Convention and Geneva Convention, to inform each and every of their agents, instrumentalities, assigns, employees, servants or attorneys that Marcia-Ann: Willardson and Charles-C.: Miller are non-belligerent neutrals on the Land in occupied territory and may call upon any officer receiving benefit from the United States its agents, assigns or instrumentalities at any time for protection accorded due and called upon pursuant to standing as Contributing Beneficiaries, Foreign Sovereign Immunities under local and international Law;

PETITIONERS SPECIFIC RELIEF

[25] Relators have reviewed each Petitioners statements and found each to be of Contributing Beneficiary standing, with intent to fulfill notice requirement to perfect their foreign sovereign immunity standing. Wherefore Relators present the attached Habeas Corpus Writs for ratification by this Court under Relators unqualified indorsements for benefits due each, Tobin-Charles: Masterson-Miller, Steven-Paul: Jensen, Philip-Nicholas: Maniatis, Lewis-Vincent: Hughes, John-Peter: Yunka, Eugene-Joseph: Koziol, Chad-Leron: Merica, Kevin-James: Crockett, James-George: Capadona.
Further your Relators, as affiants in the capacity of Contributing Beneficiaries demanding return of value, sayeth naught.
________________________________
Marcia-Ann: Willardson


________________________________
Charles-C.: Miller


PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Contract Registration Number DHL 53549085144

TO: The Honorable Supreme Court of The United States,

Your Petitioners remove the below identified action to this Court on verified complaint wherewith:

1. Tobin-Charles: Masterson-Miller, Case Number, Court Address

2. Steven-Paul: Jensen, Case Number 2:06-CR-00425-NVW-ALL In the District Court of the United States For the DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, and Case Number 3:05-cr-0049-LRH-RAM-ALL U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF NEVADA;

3. Philip-Nicholas: Maniatis, Case Number 2:06-cr-00424-SRB-ALL U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Phoenix Division) Magistrate judge case number: 2:06-mj-00110-VAM and, Case Number 3:06-cr-00050-LRH-VPC-ALL U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF NEVADA;

4. Lewis-Vincent: Hughes, Case Number CR04-0411-C U. S. District Court WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON;

5. John-Peter: Yunka, Case Number :2:06 cr-00432-UA-ALL, U.S. District Court, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division – Los Angeles)

6. Eugene-Joseph: Koziol, Case Number 1:03CR-05393-01OWW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and, Case Number 25548 (and others) in the Superior Court of the County of Plumas;

7. Chad-Leron: Merica, Case Number 2:01-cr-00038 DB and 2:06-cr-00055 DKW, in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION;

8. Kevin-James: Crockett, Case Number 2:01-CR-0038 B, in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION;

9. James-George: Capadona, Case Number 98-cr-00432-EWN, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO;

Complaining, show that they are detained, imprisoned, or restrained of their Liberty to access Republic forums on unverified charges by virtue of incomplete process which failed to disclose all relevant material facts that could be of benefit to the, incomplete process that failed to disclose all legal rights and benefits available to them, use or threat of use of coercion through the legal process as identified above, and that the detention, imprisonment, restraint of Liberty, denial of right to know, denial of right to contract without coercion, denial of right to choice of political jurisdiction, which are unjust and contrary to Law.

And, your Petitioners further show that the evidence upon which the said commitment, or restraint of Liberty was based was in substance as above stated misidentification.

And, your Petitioners through Relators further show that they are committed, detained, held in custody to a jurisdiction foreign to their Original Venue, Original Jurisdiction, by virtue of any process, judgment, decree or execution issued by any court or judge of any of the Respondents in a case where such court, judge or officer has exclusive jurisdiction, nor by any final judgment or decree of any competent court of civil or criminal jurisdictions, or any execution issued upon such judgment or decree nor for any treason, felony or other crime committed in any State or Territory of the United States of America Republic, or of The United States, for which he ought, by the Constitution, Laws, Treaties of The United States, to be delivered up to executive power, administered via current commercial forums of such State or Territory.

TO BE RELIEVED FROM WHICH SAID DETENTION, IMPAIRMENT OF LIBERTY TO CONTRACT, LIVE IN POLITICAL JURISDICTIONOF CHOICE, TO TRAVEL UNHINDERED, your Petitioners now apply, praying that The Writ of Habeas Corpus to be directed to the said Secretary of the Treasury, Henry M. Paulson, who will locate each Petitioner and notify them of release of impairment to Liberty, pursuant to the Law and Statute, in such cases made and provided, so that your Petitioners may be forthwith brought before this Honorable Court to do, submit and to receive what the Law may require on behalf of Contributing Beneficiaries.

Marcia-Ann: Willardson, and , Charles-C.: Miller above named and identified, being first duly sworn, on oath say that they have read the foregoing Petition and Complaint, verified contract, by them subscribed, and know the contents thereof and that the same is true of their own knowledge, except as to the matters and things stated to be upon information and belief as to those matters they believe them to be true.

Witness: Marcia-Ann: Willardson,
Charles-C.: Miller,
Relators, Contributing Beneficiaries,
Trustees for the Republic Union states of the United States of America.

Done this _____ day of October, 2006 AD in the state of Nevada Republic.


___________________________________
Marcia-Ann: Willardson


___________________________________
Charles-C.: Miller

State of ____________________

County of __________________

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this _________day of October, 2006, by Marcia-Ann: Willardson, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.

_________________________________
Notary Public SEAL


State of ____________________

County of __________________
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this _________day of October, 2006, by Charles-C.: Miller, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.


_________________________________
Notary Public SEAL

electric-amish
11-13-2006, 12:48 PM
Leaglieze puts me to sleep. Please short hand this for me.

What is it.

Thanks

E-A

Halophyte
11-13-2006, 01:11 PM
Leaglieze puts me to sleep. Please short hand this for me.

What is it.

Thanks

E-A

You've got to be kidding me ...

It IS in shorthand, 20 years of research condensed into one little post, read the doc.


.

Goldhedge
11-13-2006, 01:35 PM
Leaglieze puts me to sleep. Please short hand this for me.
If folks would read more about law they wouldn't be taken by surprize when it's put before them.

This ain't a football game, or sitcom spoon fed to the masses.

However, if 'spaces' were put in the doc for ease of reading it would help a great deal. Please preview your post and 'fix' it accordingly.

I find that a little formatting goes a long way to credibility. Lawyers (bless their filthy souls) double space their docs for ease of reading.

Halophyte
11-13-2006, 02:27 PM
However, if 'spaces' were put in the doc for ease of reading it would help a great deal. Please preview your post and 'fix' it accordingly.

I find that a little formatting goes a long way to credibility. Lawyers (bless their filthy souls) double space their docs for ease of reading.


Done. Formatting is an issue when transfering docs to this forum ...

I agree that most folks won't bother to digest the context of this information, it goes to the core of our country's political plight.

It is also interesting to hear that the Trading with the Enemy Act only applys to enemy combatants, not citizens. The Ex-Pat movement is not remedy, it is total folly.

Another interesting note is the full adoption of the UCC by our government only AFTER all silver coin was removed from public circulation in '63 ...

Gold is the currency of the high seas, of international trade, for offer and acceptance, but silver is of the land.

I'm still collecting pre '34 silver dollars ... a day might come that I will bring the law to a lawless courtroom ...


.

Anty Ep
11-13-2006, 02:51 PM
Whomever filed that is running the risk of getting hit with Rule 11 sanctions payable only in "worthless FRNs."

HELLO: the government is not going to let you sue it out of existence!!

Let's just say that this is finally a good theory that would do something. What I dont know because you wont summarize it for us and I don't have five minutes to spare to sort out another kooky-kommon-law-kort theory. But, let's say its a good and fantastic theory. What do you expect the feds to do? Pack it in, leave DC, fly back to Haifa or London or etc, and hand you the keys? See what I mean?

GoldWampum
11-13-2006, 03:02 PM
Good listen Halo, thanks.

Halophyte
11-13-2006, 03:03 PM
Let's just say that this is finally a good theory that would do something. What I dont know because you wont summarize it for us and I don't have five minutes to spare to sort out another kooky-kommon-law-kort theory. But, let's say its a good and fantastic theory.

Okay, you're excused for not doing your homework assignment ....... now go away.

BTW ..... everyone has a choice to be apart of the republic or, maintain the corruptus quo .... you've made your choice in its defense.


.

GoldWampum
11-13-2006, 03:08 PM
Printed :rose:

Halophyte
11-13-2006, 03:10 PM
Printed :rose:

Thanks for lending an ear .... without prejudice.


.

OnlyTheTruth
12-06-2006, 12:53 PM
Who is this joker? I agreed, does he actual think he has so much power the government will hand him the keys to the system, so he can run it correctly. He is living in a dream world.. Gawd !: