MCKINNEY STILL ON TRAIL OF 9/11 COVERUP

[Large Sarge]

MCKINNEY STILL ON TRAIL OF 9/11 COVERUP

Jul 26, 2005 - FreeMarketNews.com

by staff reports

U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who believes that western governments may be complicit in what would seem to be Muslim fundamentalist terror unleashed on the West, took another step forward in documenting such suspicions by holding a formal, eight-hour government hearing in Washington DC. last Friday. Witnesses who were critical of the 9/11 Commission testified that there should have been more attention paid to controversial evidence undermining the officially sanctioned view of events regarding the collapse of the New York World Trade Towers. McKinney’s website explained the reasons for the hearing as follows: “One year after the release of the 9/11 Commission Final Report many questions about what transpired on September 11, 2001 and who should be held accountable still remain unanswered. At this briefing, family members will address questions about 9/11that remain unanswered, and the shortcomings of the 9/11 Commission. Other experts and authors will explore the omissions and errors in the Commission’s Final Report, will provide historical perspective not found in the Report and will review its recommendations and offer alternatives.”



The Bush Administration has consistently and vehemently denied any foreknowledge of 911 or involvement in a cover up of any of the specifics. The Administration, almost all holders of high political office, whether democratic or republican and almost all major media outlets characterize statements regarding a cover-up by credibly elected or appointed authorities as “conspiratorial” – both simplistic and inaccurate, not worthy of serious consideration. Despite, the position of the Bush Administration – and of the US political power structure generally – questions about 9/11 refuse to go away and the Internet itself has predictably become a conduit of such queries, as well as numerous theories about events that contradict the currently accepted chronology. A quick Google search shows that about 1.6 million mentions of a 9/11 “conspiracy,” 1.37 million mentions of a 9/11 “fraud,” and 4.4 million mentions of a 9/11 coverup.

While the questions and explanations of the panelists regarding 9/11 differed, there was some level of commonality. The majority believed that the Bush Administration at best ignored a series of warnings given to them, and at worst actually participated in planning or execution of the events. They also agreed that the clear motive was power, and that the events of 9/11 have been highly exploited to attack civil liberties. The hearing panelists included experts on security and terrorism, former CIA agents, and families of 9/11 victims. C-SPAN TV was said to be taping the entire event for rebroadcast at a later date. Cynthia McKinney has been persistent in her questioning of 9/11 and has attracted critisism for statements on the issue. An article in the right wing Weekly Standard early in 2005 focused on conflicts of interest that provide an implicit rationale for her criticisms, as follows: “Appearing in print just months after the September 11 attacks, McKinney's charges couldn't be excused. Nor could her list of campaign donors, which included both terrorist sympathizers like Abdurahman Alamoudi, the former executive director of the American Muslim Council, and apparent actual terrorists like former college professor Sami Al-Arian. Nor could her October 12, 2001, letter to Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, in which she rebuked New York mayor Rudy Giuliani for returning the prince's post-9/11 "gift" of $10 million and urged bin Talal to donate the funds to 'charities outside the mayor's control,' especially those that dealt with "poor blacks who sleep on the street in the shadows of our nation's Capitol." -CM

[SilverSalmon]

Bump for a truth telling Patriot! Go get em! Vote a third partty.

[Stonewall]

One tough lady!

[Conk]

Too bad so many see her as a nut job.

[SilverSalmon]

Bump for Patriots' Thread. The matrix is strong break free.

[Mined Games]

Originally Posted by Conk

Too bad so many see her as a nut job.

It's funny how the mainstream media always attempts to marginalize those who speak the truth. Rudy Ghouliani tried that same crap on Ron Paul during the GOP debates, and the media ate it up! I've got a lot of respect for Cynthia McKinney.

[SilverSalmon]

Originally Posted by Mined Games

It's funny how the mainstream media always attempts to marginalize those who speak the truth. Rudy Ghouliani tried that same crap on Ron Paul during the GOP debates, and the media ate it up! I've got a lot of respect for Cynthia McKinney.

One of very few on this site unfortunately. Everyone talks about patriots here, but it appears they have to be land owning white males. WHO ELSE HAS SPOKEN OUT LIKE CYNTHIA. Now I will say this, if she were a White male she would have a following bigger than Ron Paul. I hate to say it, but it's true. Her gender and race hurt her something fierce. I'm a truth seekers period!!!!

[MetalManiac]

Originally Posted by SilverSalmon

One of very few on this site unfortunately. Everyone talks about patriots here, but it appears they have to be land owning white males. WHO ELSE HAS SPOKEN OUT LIKE CYNTHIA. Now I will say this, if she were a White male she would have a following bigger than Ron Paul. I hate to say it, but it's true. Her gender and race hurt her something fierce. I'm a truth seekers period!!!!

Dude, that's not true.

I'm a "White Cracker Male" and my impressions
of Cynthia is that she's a total wacko because
that's what the MEDIA has portrayed her to be/say.

They have STRONG influence!

Case in point...

Didn't Cynthia say that the Gubmint was going
around killing people in the last hurricane disaster?

That kind of stuff comes off as TOTALLY WACKO
unless she has real evidence that it happened.

If it DID happen, I wouldn't be that surprised but
we need real evidence.

[SilverSalmon]

Okkkkkkkkkkkkkk, no problem, I hear ya. just my 2 cents.

[blueice]

Originally Posted by Stonewall

One tough lady!

More like One Nut lady.....

[Willie Peter]

To me, mckinney comes across as an angry Moon-Bat..

[SilverSalmon]

Bumpbidibump

[SilverSalmon]

BTT............... You don't have to vote for Obama or Mc Cain

[Saoirse]

If McKinny is doing this, it's because she's being used by TPTB to discredit the truth movement.

TPTB takes the most insane and marginalized idiots and leads them to come out on the forefront of any serious and necessary muckraking efforts. The result is to discredit the effort by association.

That's why with Chomsky they have to ignore him, he's too credible.

You'll never see people who look like the ones in this picture get any airtime for asking the tough questions:



But rest assured you'll see plenty of these types of idiots on TV and in the papers, even if they are protesting the same issue:

[MayaGold]

Originally Posted by Saoirse

If McKinny is doing this, it's because she's being used by TPTB to discredit the truth movement.

TPTB takes the most insane and marginalized idiots and leads them to come out on the forefront of any serious and necessary muckraking efforts. The result is to discredit the effort by association.

That's why with Chomsky they have to ignore him, he's too credible.

Chomskys voting for McKinney.
https://mckinney2008.com/PRESIDENT/i...sk=view&id=517
So their both conspiracy moonbats. I'm glad AIPAC ran her out of congress in '02 when she first started squalking paranoid 911 nonsense

[Saoirse]

As I said: They ignore Chomsky, and they let loons lead movements they want discredited.

We hear about McKinny, because she's a loon.

No one ever hears about Chomsky, except in a case like this when they can tie him to her, to paint him as a loon.

[jedemdasseine]

I swear I know that girl with the mohawk. haha.

True about McKinney probably being used to discredit any truth.

Chomsky is a gatekeeper, plain and simple.

[johngr]

Originally Posted by jedemdasseine

I swear I know that girl with the mohawk. haha.

True about McKinney probably being used to discredit any truth.

Chomsky is a gatekeeper, plain and simple.

Noam Chomsky functions as a "debate ceiling" on certain matters, particularly to do with Israel. The furthest possible permissible criticism of anything the actual power holders do (or is "theorized" they do) is whatever Chomsky (or his fellow controlled opposition agents like Naomi Wolf) articulates. You will notice he ridicules ideas that let the cat too far out of the bag.

According to a poster on another forum: "When people ask questions regarding the 9-11 attacks he’ll always dismiss them as “conspiracy.” The role of a debate ceiling is to never allow the debate to pass a certain level. The thinking being “if Chomsky [dismisses it as being to far out] it [couldn't] be true because Chomsky is a ‘radical’ who [is not afraid of telling] the truth."