Zionists Exposed by Islamic Academic

[sbgb]

There is a radio show "The French Connection" which exposes Zionism and broadcasts Monday thru Friday. The radio host was fired from his network just this past week for exposing the truth. But he has continued to broadcast from his own web site since then.

If the mainstream media were doing truthful reporting, they would be doing these types of interviews, but they don't.

Yesterday's show: Part one of interview with Mohammed Rafiq from the UK. Topic: The roots of the Ashkenazi Zionism. http://www.iamthewitness.com.nyud.ne...th8Feb2006.mp3

Today's show: Part two of interview.
Topic: Are Crypto Jews running America? And who controls the Crypto Jews? Is President Bush a Crypto Jew?
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Smith9Feb2006_2.mp3

Today's show: Second hour,
Commentary by radio show host, Daryl Bradford Smith
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Smith9Feb2006_1.mp3

So now everyone has a choice regarding information on current events: cartoons with bombs brought to you by the mainstream press, or interviews with a muslim academic exposing the Zionists by Daryl Bradford Smith.

I've found the best way to download these radio shows is to right click the link, "save target as" and save file to your computer. Then after it's downloaded, play it. This way will also give you the option of making copies for friends to hear.

[Ponce Cuba]

Thanks for the links SB, I'll be sure to visit and donate if I have to.....

[Didga]

Daryl Bradford Smith bashed Alex Jones pretty hard in this broadcast stating that he and the whole of GCN were a nest of zionist disinformationists. I am not too sure about this angle, although Alex does not mention the Israeli 911 involvement. I think this maybe be due to where his own research has taken him, places like Bohemian Grove. However I have not been following Alex of late due to the fact he doesnt broadcast into Australia (and you gotta pay for his web stuff). Daryl Bradford Smith and Eric Hufschmid are the best of the 911 truth movement IMHO. I will check out Michael Collins Piper.

[Halophyte]

Originally Posted by Didga

Daryl Bradford Smith bashed Alex Jones pretty hard in this broadcast stating that he and the whole of GCN were a nest of zionist disinformationists. I am not too sure about this angle, although Alex does not mention the Israeli 911 involvement. I think this maybe be due to where his own research has taken him, places like Bohemian Grove.

Maybe he discovered a 'squib' shockwave with a 'g' wave formation, compared to the status quo 'z' wave 'squib' ... ?


I noticed the self appointed gardians of truth are like house cats -

- they have a way of chewing on earch other's tales.


.

[Reformed Idealist]

"Islamic Academic". That's a good one. Quick, list any Nobel Prizes these guys have for any solid scientific advancement. (i.e., peace prizes don't count)

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Didga

Daryl Bradford Smith bashed Alex Jones pretty hard in this broadcast stating that he and the whole of GCN were a nest of zionist disinformationists. I am not too sure about this angle, although Alex does not mention the Israeli 911 involvement. I think this maybe be due to where his own research has taken him, places like Bohemian Grove.

I have my doubts about Alex Jones. What better disinformationalist to have than one who has a shrill voice? Alex is married to a Jewess. I really can't recall reading anything about the "Bohemian Grove" from anyone other than Alex Jones.

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

"Islamic Academic". That's a good one. Quick, list any Nobel Prizes these guys have for any solid scientific advancement. (i.e., peace prizes don't count)

Who do you think determines who will be awarded those Nobel prizes? One does not receive a Nobel prize by criticizing those who award them.

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by hoarder

Who do you think determines who will be awarded those Nobel prizes? One does not receive a Nobel prize by criticizing those who award them.

Ok, name one scientific achievement by an "Islamic Academic" worthy of a Nobel Prize in the last 50 years. That should take care of that concern of yours. And you do realize they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to Arafat for supporting suicide bombings, so it isn't as if they are opposed to giving Muslims Nobel Prizes.

[Halophyte]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

And you do realize they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to Arafat for supporting suicide bombings, so it isn't as if they are opposed to giving Muslims Nobel Prizes.

Award for the criminal mind, a medal for spilling less blood.

.

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

Ok, name one scientific achievement by an "Islamic Academic" worthy of a Nobel Prize in the last 50 years. That should take care of that concern of yours. And you do realize they gave the Nobel Peace Prize to Arafat for supporting suicide bombings, so it isn't as if they are opposed to giving Muslims Nobel Prizes.

I must confess I have not kept up with scientific achievements so I don't know the answer. What scientific achievement did Arafat make to receive one? Arafat was nothing more than a NWO shill, a false flag. In spite of all the saber rattling, his "enemies" could have had him decades ago.
Zionist modus operandi: Lead the opposition and control both the enemy's image and the outcome of the power struggle.

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by Halophyte

Award for the criminal mind, a medal for spilling less blood.

.

Umm, whatever you are talking about you certainly aren't addressing my point. But nice try anyways.

[mozkill]

Ok, name one scientific achievement by an "Islamic Academic" worthy of a Nobel Prize in the last 50 years.

You have a very good point. I would be nice to hear if anyone knows of at least any good Islamic nominations for the prize.

[Halophyte]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

Umm, whatever you are talking about you certainly aren't addressing my point. But nice try anyways.

I'm just not fond of pandering to the dogs of war.

Think about it.

.

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by mozkill

You have a very good point. I would be nice to hear if anyone knows of at least any good Islamic nominations for the prize.

There have at least one in literature, but none that I know about for science.

Now, before you misunderstand me, I am NOT stating that I think Muslims are not intelligent, or incapable of winning a Nobel Prize. They are suffering with a governmental and religious system that appears completely adverse to any intellectual pursuits. This really is a situation where they are in their own dark ages. Fear of progress and outsiders. Suspicion of new ideas. Suppression of dissent. This is having a chilling effect on the whole world, even outside of the Muslim world. The "barbarians" are at the gate again, just like in the Roman times.

[hoarder]

I think we're getting off on a tangent here, as this is a minor point in the big picture, but here are some towelhead acheivements:

http://www.masada2000.org/nobel.html

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by Halophyte

I'm just not fond of pandering to the dogs of war.

Think about it.

.

You mean pandering to Arafat is OK?????? Global terrorist supporter numero uno is not pandering to the dogs of war? Not to mention the billions he stole from his own people so his wife could go on shopping sprees in Paris.

I mean, if giving money to militants to blow up babies, women, and children on Yom Kippur isn't the most loving, peaceful act I have ever heard of! What a wonderful man he was!

Perhaps we should have given the Peace Prize to Pol Pot or Charles Manson, or Jim Jones. I'm sure they had some good qualities too that we are just overlooking.

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

They are suffering with a governmental and religious system that appears completely adverse to any intellectual pursuits. This really is a situation where they are in their own dark ages. Fear of progress and outsiders. Suspicion of new ideas. Suppression of dissent.

It's THEIR land, culture, race and religion. It has worked fine for them for thousands of years. Let them be.

This is having a chilling effect on the whole world, even outside of the Muslim world. The "barbarians" are at the gate again, just like in the Roman times.

No, the "whole world" has been sticking their nose in the Middle East where it doesn't belong. Peace between Islam and the West was for the most part a 100 year old fact before we started meddling in a big way at the behest of Zionists.

[Halophyte]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

You mean pandering to Arafat is OK?????? Global terrorist supporter numero uno is not pandering to the dogs of war? Not to mention the billions he stole from his own people so his wife could go on shopping sprees in Paris.

I mean, if giving money to militants to blow up babies, women, and children on Yom Kippur isn't the most loving, peaceful act I have ever heard of! What a wonderful man he was!

Perhaps we should have given the Peace Prize to Pol Pot or Charles Manson, or Jim Jones. I'm sure they had some good qualities too that we are just overlooking.

Bingo !

Have a cigar.

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by hoarder

I think we're getting off on a tangent here, as this is a minor point in the big picture, but here are some towelhead acheivements:

http://www.masada2000.org/nobel.html

Ok, let's examine some of these:

Ahmed H. Zewail - won his award at Cal Tech

Prof. Dr. Abdus Salam - won his award at the Imperial College London, though originally from Pakistan - not exactly an Arab.


I like this part of your article: And remember out of the 7, only 2 were for science and both of those won those in the Western World.

There are a mere 12Million Jews in the entire world yet they have received 169Nobel Prizes. The Muslims number 1.4 Billion (with a very big "B")... or 117 times the number of Jews! Based upon this 117:1 Muslim-to-Jewish ratio, one might expect the Muslims to have 22,260 Nobel Laureates.
They haveSEVEN!and one of them [Arafat] is a murderer (Allahu Akbar, indeed!)
Unless the Swedes and Norwegians start awarding Nobel Prizes for plane hijackings, pizza shop bombings, civilian bus attacks, Jihad suicides/homicides, drive-by shootings, throat-slittings, embassy attacks and other such acts of barbarisms, the embarrassing low level of contribution to the welfare of Civilization and Mankind by the [Arab] Muslim world will continue. The Jewish People, meanwhile, will continue being the Lights Unto All Nations.

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by hoarder

It's THEIR land, culture, race and religion. It has worked fine for them for thousands of years. Let them be.No, the "whole world" has been sticking their nose in the Middle East where it doesn't belong. Peace between Islam and the West was for the most part a 100 year old fact before we started meddling in a big way at the behest of Zionists.

So I am taking this to mean you were in favor of the Huns, Goths, etc. and the barbarian hordes collapsing Western civilization for 1000 yrs, and you were opposed to the Enlightenment and all subsequent scientific achievements?

Why can't you call a spade a spade and just admit that this "civilization" is a problem. Are you going to just let them be as they set up their institutions over here and suppress our freedoms? You think freedom of the press is ok to restrict just because one of them is upset over a cartoon? This does affect you in a lot of ways, not just if they manage to detonate a nuclear weapon. But, you can just stick your head in the sand if you want, it is your life and you are free to do whatever you want.

By the way, I LOVE how you say that it has "worked fine" for them for thousands of years. Does the female half of that population feel that is has worked just fine? How about their economy and the standard of living. Is that working just fine? What is going to happen to them if they run out of oil? They are going to support themselves selling Danish flags to burn? What other economic activity have they come up with?

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

I like this part of your article:

You're getting back to your flawed premise that the awarding of Nobel prizes is completely unbiased and objective.
This thread is way off course. Suggesting that towelheads have not acheived much in terms of Nobel prizes falls short of refuting Mohammed Rafiq's claims in the original post.

It has gone something like this: "Mr Rafiq does not know what he's talking about because Arabs have not won as many Nobel prizes as Jews".
What kind of argument is that?

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by hoarder

You're getting back to your flawed premise that the awarding of Nobel prizes is completely unbiased and objective.
This thread is way off course. Suggesting that towelheads have not acheived much in terms of Nobel prizes falls short of refuting Mohammed Rafiq's claims in the original post.

It has gone something like this: "Mr Rafiq does not know what he's talking about because Arabs have not won as many Nobel prizes as Jews".
What kind of argument is that?

No, I'm not even talking about Mr.Rafiq. I was merely pointing out an oxymoron in the title. We don't say a Christian academic in the realms of intellectual achievement, why would you call Mr. Rafiq an "Islamic Academic"? Yes, the thread is off course - so I'll just stop. You can go back to your jew-bashing.

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

Why can't you call a spade a spade and just admit that this "civilization" is a problem.

It only becomes a problem if people from other civilizations insist on constantly interfacing with them.

Are you going to just let them be as they set up their institutions over here and suppress our freedoms?

Absolutely not, but it is the Jews who have set up their institutions here. They control most of the mass media, advertising and entertainment in the world.

You think freedom of the press is ok to restrict just because one of them is upset over a cartoon?

No. But freedom of the press is already restricted by those who own the mass media. The Jews are the ones who published these antagonistic cartoons.

This does affect you in a lot of ways, not just if they manage to detonate a nuclear weapon. But, you can just stick your head in the sand if you want, it is your life and you are free to do whatever you want.

There may be no limit to what they might be antagonized by the Jewsmedia into doing. That's no reason to declare war on them all.

By the way, I LOVE how you say that it has "worked fine" for them for thousands of years. Does the female half of that population feel that is has worked just fine? How about their economy and the standard of living. Is that working just fine? What is going to happen to them if they run out of oil? They are going to support themselves selling Danish flags to burn? What other economic activity have they come up with?

The Jews have convinced you that we should impose our ways on them for their own good. Are you still an interventionist Bush supporter? Who is going to invade America for our own good? China? They could call it "Operation American Freedom". It wouldn't take much for them to put 100,000,000 troops here with AK47's to "free" us and "protect" us.

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

jew-bashing.

Towelhead bashing is OK but criticizing our Khazar rulers is not.

[Reformed Idealist]

Ok, you stick to your wishy-washy worldview where everything is OK if you call it "cultural", where you are unable to define right and wrong because you don't want to offend anyone, and unable to see America's greatness compared to other societies because you are blinded by Bush-bashing, America bashing, or whatever. I'll stick to mine.

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

Ok, you stick to your wishy-washy worldview ... I'll stick to mine.

Hit and run debating.
Why not refute mine instead?

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by hoarder

Hit and run debating.
Why not refute mine instead?

Refute what? That the Jews run the media? That Arab suppression of women's right is OK because it is their culture? What do you want me to refute?

[hoarder]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

America's greatness compared

Exactly. We are greater compared to them. Does that mean we should invade and conquer any country that the Jewsmedia tells us is not as great as us?

I can think of many reasons the Chinese might think they are "greater" than us. In some ways they are...productivity. Is this moral justification for them to invade us?

Interventionism is a dangerous idea they have sold us. You better think about how it will all end up....world government with the Jews in command.

[Reformed Idealist]

Originally Posted by hoarder

Exactly. We are greater compared to them. Does that mean we should invade and conquer any country that the Jewsmedia tells us is not as great as us?

I can think of many reasons the Chinese might think they are "greater" than us. In some ways they are...productivity. Is this moral justification for them to invade us?

Interventionism is a dangerous idea they have sold us. You better think about how it will all end up....world government with the Jews in command.

Well, I think it perhaps simplistic to think we invaded anyone just because we are greater than them. Since when is a nation going to war to defend itself or its interests or to secure resources (oil) unusual? Is it wrong? Well, not necessarily. But if it comes down to us or them, why do you have to feel guilty for choosing "us"?

In this day with nuclear weapons a real entity, why is wrong to feel threatened when Iran states they are going to make one and use it? Isn't that a threat?

Now, for your China analogy. Is it wrong for them to invade us? Maybe, maybe not. What if they felt it was in their vital interests? Of course I am going to say its wrong, but they may not feel that way? Shouldn't we do everything possible to defend against just such a scenario including securing our access to resources - i.e. oil? If this war is just a cover for securing our oil access, and all of the WMD/terrorism stuff is all just made up, this war may still be justified if it leads to secure access to resources for us and makes us strong enough to prevent or defeat a threat from China or others. Weakening ourselves, or not building up our military, or depriving ourselves of cheap resources may be enough to ENCOURAGE another country to invade or attack us.

[Large Sarge]

Originally Posted by Reformed Idealist

Well, I think it perhaps simplistic to think we invaded anyone just because we are greater than them. Since when is a nation going to war to defend itself or its interests or to secure resources (oil) unusual? Is it wrong? Well, not necessarily. But if it comes down to us or them, why do you have to feel guilty for choosing "us"?

In this day with nuclear weapons a real entity, why is wrong to feel threatened when Iran states they are going to make one and use it? Isn't that a threat?

.

Not trying to take away from hoarders fine rebuttals, but....

"us or them" Wow that is a big leap....

Iran is backed into a corner by our Zionist leaders, it has followed every rule about Nuke Non-proliferation, yet it continues to be harassed and hounded...

it wants a peaceful nuclear program and it will not be allowed it...

"Us versus them"

more like "Zionist Jews versus the rest of the world, as long as the rest of the world is bleeding and paying for it"