9/11 NO planes vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV:* praticability *

[MattMarriott]

9/11 NO planes and Media Hoax vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV: praticability, explained worldwide first by Matt Marriott

People don't get the script for 9/11 because they don't understand two basic end times features:

1. ALL mass media is TOTALLY controlled by the illuminati.

2. The masses have been reduced to a state near complete brainwash. They became blind. Black is the end times color.

That's is why the illuminati knew the reaction to the truth would be:
"This didnt just happen on CNN! Umm..it happened in the middle of a large population center in broad daylight."

"If you're going to tell me that every single eyewitness who saw the planes hit is "in on it", then don't bother"

The hoaxers knew the script would work, since there were no doubts about the only two relevant issues, i.e. would it be possible:

- to keep away from the masses the few eyewitnesses (testimonies and their films, photos) that understood there were no planes? These people are.: 1. WTC survivors including firemen (most of them died) that saw the scene close to the "impact" and saw no debris of the planes; 2. people on the ground that hear no noise or had their eyes and cameras focused at the point of the second "impact".
Answer is obviouly yes, since the illuminati totally control mass media.

- to watch it really happen in Manhattan (the rest of the eyewitnesses, thousands) and as a "second impact" hoax in TV (dozens of millions in that morning around the world), and yet for all these people not be able to see what really happened?
Answer is obviouly yes. since the illuminati had previously tested to what utter limits the masses could be fooled "live", and to what length the trick could be covered-up afterwards.
The ultimate example: state lottery drawings are broadcasted on TV at prime time and yet the jackpot "winner" is always the same.

BTW, check when was it exposed the first time
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...ackpot+exposed

-----
9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/t...-marriott.html

[crazychicken]

I have replied on other "NO PLANES AT 9/11 threads, I was there AND I have a picture of one of my trucks parked next to one of the landing gear.

This is stupid shit!

I'm not passing on things I don't know about, but I was there.

The only way to counter this is to:
1. Prove that I am not a real person, rather a webbot
2. Prove that it is not a landing gear, rather a undercover and cleverly disquised tricycle
3. Prove that you are not a jerk off
4. Get a life

9/11 happened more than a few years ago.

Work on change, not history. Try as you might you can't change it.

Matt-You really don't believe some of the crap you espouse, do you?

[Book]

Won't believe your own eyes???
:rolleyes:

[Catwagon]

I was there AND I have a picture of one of my trucks parked next to one of the landing gear.

This mass blindness conspiracy BS about their not being planes involved is stupid. Crazy Chicken's post above only confirms my belief that some folks' foil hats are on way too tight.

There's a good reason why the two airframes weren't found mixed in with the other building debris. That's because the aluminum they were made of melted away at about 900* as it was nearly all made from 7075 aluminum.

The building temps reached approximately 1500* at least, maybe even more, so the two aircraft just melted away like wax, that's all.

[J.D.Rockinfeller]

Im STILL WAITING for a shred of proof that a plane hit the first bldg....the operative word here...PROOF!

[P-99er]

Let me take a wild guess: the "illuminati" is\are Jewish.

[MattMarriott]

http://who-are-the-illuminati.blogspot.com/

BTW, one of those thousands of eyewitnesses that can show his photo material:

9.30 am -- This was the view from our living room window in Brooklyn, looking west to Manhattan, about 20 minutes after the second strike. It seems hard to believe now, but I didn't realize anything had happened until I was leaving for work. I walked into the bedroom to turn off the radio and heard the announcer say something about an airplane hitting a building. I turned on the TV and saw an image of the World Trade Center, turned my head and saw the same image out the window.

http://camazotz.com/wtc/large/index.html

[MattMarriott]

Originally Posted by MattMarriott

The hoaxers knew the script would work, since there were no doubts about the only two relevant issues, i.e. would it be possible:

- to keep away from the masses the few eyewitnesses (testimonies and their films, photos) that understood there were no planes?
These people are.:
1. ....

2. people on the ground that hear no noise or had their eyes and cameras focused at the point of the second "impact".
Answer is obviouly yes, since the illuminati totally control mass media.

Now guess what happened to the witnesses that did not get it and did contact the media/government...

[keehah]

Let me refrase this post to confirm I read it right: So the fact that you seem to always focus on the most contriversal 911 in-side aided theories (and usually fake attack, not the mountain of non-contriversal facts showing government complicity aiding some what real attacks) and are told the same in replys is now PROOF that those contriversal theories are true?!?

OK after this, mentally I'm ready to move you down to troll or agent from misguided (and a little weak) but groping for truths.

[blueice]

Matt, you have had several months since you wrote this thread, do you still believe that no airplanes were involved in 9/11 ??

[MattMarriott]

Five years after 9/11, the sheep didn't get the basic script for 9/11 - why

Five years after 9/11, the sheep didn't get the basic script for 9/11 because they they became blind. Black is the end times color.
Total brainwash includes not having the ability to recognise these two basic illuminati end times features:

1. ALL mass media is TOTALLY controlled by the illuminati.

2. The illuminati have now successfully completed their agendas of totally terrorizing and brainwashing the sheep (celebrated officially with the satanic ritual murder of Terri Schindler, whom the illuminati named Schiavo, slave). Just think about the fact that now the large majority knows that 9/11 was an inside job, and yet about everyone will deny it in public. No wonder: the consequences of total brainwash and total terror include total lack of reaction, even at the sight of the doors of the slaughterhouse.

9/11 Eyewitnesses in Lower Manhattan - not a problem for the illuminati script

Of course the 9/11 plan had a few "witnesses" being immediately interviewed to let us know they had seen the planes. But what about those watching on TV and above all, the real eyewitnesses, those who saw what they should have not seen?
The same end times features mentioned above explain also why the eyewitnesses were not a problem in the illuminati script for Lower Manhattan:
- total control of mass media;
- the illuminati knew that the "total terror" (officiallly launched at Waco, Texas, 1992) and "total brainwash" agendas were already advanced enough.

Eyewitnesses: the answer to the THREE questions that mattered was yes

The hoaxers knew the script would work, since there were no doubts about the answer to the three most important questions.

1. The key question: would it be possible to completely censor the few eyewitnesses (testimonies and their films, photos) that understood there were no planes? These people are:
a) WTC survivors including firemen (most of them died) that saw the scene close to the "impact" and saw no debris of the planes.
b) People on the ground that hear no noise or had their eyes and cameras focused at the point of the second "impact".
BTW, check out what happened to the VIDEO of one of these eyewitnesses, who had the camera zoomed at the area where the explosion simulating the second crash took place...
http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/t...etonating.html

2. Would it be possible to completely censor those who witnessed the unprecedented demolition of both WTC towers or taped it on video?

3. Finally the question that matters about the thousands of people that would refer to the only detail that could immediately expose the core cover-up, i.e. who heard the explosion of the two mini-Hydrogen bombs just BEFORE the two WTC towers came down.
It was impossible to completely censor such testimonies as the events took place. The question is: would it be possible to make sure they would never be heard again?
BTW, here is a VIDEO with a collection of such statements from 9/11, short after the bombs were detonated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uOFXsfskM
Answer to all three questions is obviously yes, since the illuminati totally control mass media.

BTW, the question about those who got the classic demolition of WTC 7 on video is a non-question, since the goal of that part of the script was to terrorize the eyewitnesses, by letting them know that it was an inside job.

TV Witnesses: the answer to the questions that mattered was yes

Would it be possible to fool the TV audience? Answer is obviously yes, since the illuminati had previously tested to what utter limits the masses could be fooled "live", and to what length these kind of hoaxes can be covered-up afterwards.
As far as the duration, the ultimate example is the moon landing hoax. But it was staged only a few times. As far as the frequency, the ultimate example is state lottery drawings, broadcasted on TV weekly at prime time and yet the jackpot "winner" is always the same. Because despite being able to watch the trick, blind people will not be able to see it.
BTW, check when was it exposed the first time
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...ackpot+exposed

Even better than in the cases of the moon landing hoax or the state lottery drawings, in this case the illuminati could play the extra "thousands of eyewitnesses" card. So the illuminati had absolutely nothing to fear from the TV witnesses. Later, as the truth would be spoken, the illuminati knew the reaction would be:

- "This didn't just happen on CNN! Umm..it happened in the middle of a large population center in broad daylight."
- "If you're going to tell me that every single eyewitness who saw the planes hit is "in on it", then don't bother"

[sammydogs64]

Matt, you sir are in need of professional help. Please people why don't you exhibit have as much energy on the economy and what is being done to destroy that by the powers that be as oppossed to these loony ideas