mini H-bomb in basement upwards directed: Finnish Military Expert solves last unclear

[MattMarriott]

Mini H-bomb in basement upwards directed: Finnish Military Expert solves last unclear issue about how 9/11 was executed
For me, this was the only question that was not yet clear. Now it is...

The three basic types of non-nuclear bombs used in the 9/11 WTC operation, depending on the goal:
- to simulate the impacts of the "planes" against the structure, by leaving the imprints of the "wings";
- to simulate the explosion of the "kerosine" of the "airplanes" immediately after;
- to be used at the moment where the towers would be pulled.

Five years later there can be no doubts left that the way the towers were pulled was a premiere: the first controlled demolition using nuclear bombs: using a mini Hydrogen-bomb in basement, upwards directed.
Notice that the title of the link is the OPPOSITE of what you can conclude...

The first time that a government uses nuclear bombs against its own citizens. One of two premieres that goes unnoticed... as you would expect from the Laws of End Times Reductionism.

-----------------
Notes about the link above:
the title of the link is the OPPOSITE of what you can conclude;
as of today, the finnish military expert did not get the core lie, the fact that no planes were used.
Before reading, see these facts, from the same source:

Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC:
1. Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as recorded by official studies. Concrete dust was created instantly throughout the towers when the fusion device million degree heat rapidly expanded water vapour 1000-fold in the concrete floors.
2. Superheated steels ablating (vaporizing continuously as they fall) as seen in video clips of the towers collapsing. This requires uniform temperatures roughly twice that of thermite. Conventional demolition or explosive charges (thermate, rdx, hdx etc.) cannot transfer heath so rapidly that the steel goes above it's boiling temperature.
3. 22 ton outer wall steel sections ejected 200 meters into the winter garden. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without heavy, solid surface mounts.
4. 330 ton section of outer wall columns ripping off side of tower. Cutting charges cannot eject heavy steels linked together and throwing charges cannot provide the energy required without very heavy, solid surfaces to mount those charges.
5. Molten ponds of steel at the bottom of elevator shafts (WTC1, WTC2, WTC7). Massive heath loads have been present at the lower parts of these high-rise buildings. As one of the witnesses after seeing the flow of metals declared: "no one will be found alive".
6. The spire behaviour (stands for 20-30 seconds, evaporates and goes down, steel dust remains in the air where the spire was). The spire did not stand because it lost its durability when the joints vaporized.
7. Sharp spikes in seismograph readings (Richter 2.1 and 2.3) occurred at the beginning of collapse for both towers. Short duration and high power indicate an explosive event.
8. A press weighting 50 tons disappeared from a basement floor of Twin Towers and was never recovered from debris. Not possible with collapses or controlled demolitions. The press was vaporized or melted totally.
9. Bone dust cloud around the WTC. This was found not until spring 2006 from the Deutsche Bank building. (In excess of 700 human remains found on the roof and from air vents). See http://www.911citizenswatch.org/print.php?sid=906
10. Fires took 100 days to extinguish despite continuous spraying of water. Thermate would burn out totally and then cool down much faster, just in a few days. This long cooling time means the total heath load being absorbed into the steels of the WTC was massive, far in excess anything found in collapses or typical controlled demolitions.
11. Brown shades of color in the air due nuclear radiation forming NO2, NO3 and nitric acid. TV and documentary footage changed the color balance to blue to disguise this fact indicating complicity in the coverup.
12. Elevated Tritium values measured in the WTC area but not elsewhere in New York. Official studies stated that 8 EXIT signs from two commercial Boeing jets were responsible. The tritium in those EXIT signs is insufficient to explain the measurements (very little tritium is available for measuring after evaporation into air as hydrogen and as tritiated water vapour. This can provide conclusive proof of fusion devices and therefore US/Israeli military involvement.
13. Pyroclastic flow observed in the concrete-based clouds. Only found with volcanic eruptions and nuclear detonations. The explosion squibs cool down just a few milliseconds after the explosion or after having reached some 10 meters in the air. Pyroclastic flow will not mix with other clouds meaning very serious heath in those clouds not possible with the conventional demolition or explosive charges. The pyroclastic clouds were cooling down at the WTC but this process took some 30 seconds. See http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...25012075538113
14. Huge expanding dust clouds 5 times the volume of the building indicating extreme levels of heat generated far in excess of traditional demolition explosives.
15. Rubble height was some 10% of the original instead of 33% expected in a traditional demolition. Fusion device removal of underground central steel framework allowed upper framework to fall into this empty space and reduce the rubble height.
16. No survivors found, except some firefighters in one corner pocket in the rubble who looked up to see blue sky above them instead of being crushed by collapsing debris. Upward fusion flashlight-like beam of destruction missed this pocket but removed debris above those lucky firemen.
17. 14 rescue dogs and some rescue workers died far too soon afterward to be attributed to asbestos or dust toxins (respiratory problems due to alpha and tritium particles created by fusion are far more toxic)
18. Record concentrations of near-atomic size metal particles found in dust studies due to ablated steel. Only possible with vaporized (boiling) steels.
19. Decontamination procedure used at Ground Zero (hi-pressure water spraying) for all steel removed from site. Water spraying contains fusion radioactivity.
20. No bodies, furniture or computers found in the rubble, but intact sheets of paper covered the streets with fine dust. Items with significant mass absorbed fusion energy (neutrons, x-rays) and were vaporized while paper did not. Paper and powder theory.
21. 200 000 gallon sprinkler water tanks on the roofs of WTC1 and WTC2, but no water in the ruins. Heat of fusion devices vaporized large reservoirs of water.
22. Reports of cars exploding around the WTC and many burned out wrecks could be seen that had not been hit by debris. Fusion energy (heath radiation and the neutrons) caused cars to ignite and burn far from WTC site.
23. Wide area electrical outage, repairs took over 3 months. Fusion devices cause EM pulse with Compton scattering. See German engineers help the USA plate 5. http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas...e/defaulte.htm
24. EM pulse was recorded by broadcast cameras with high quality electronic circuitry. This occurred at the same time as the seismic peaks recorded by Lamont Doherty during the beginning of the collapse. This is due to the Compton Effect and resulted in a large area power outage at the WTC.

http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm


Note: as of today, the finnish military expert did not get the core lie, the fact that no planes were used.

[silverbullet]

Does anyone else see a garbled mess? :afraid:

I'm not even going to try to read it.

[mamboni]

Yes Silverbullet - me too!!!

[fasTTcar]

Next time try preview post before posting.

[anythingsharp]

There is too much to read+one needs to be an expert,but on the day of 911 in a few hrs after it happened I stuck a Geiger counter from the window of my Bronx apt and it registered over 30 counts/min.The background radiation in the most parts of NYC is between 10 and 20 counts,30 counts, while insignificant, has never been observed by me either before or after 911.Ground zero may very well have had 1000`s of counts/min.It could be explained by the massive amounts of dust in the air or???I used the Geiger counter on 911 because it looked like a micronuke to me right then and also I felt that something was amiss from the official story right as it was unfolding.My guess is that DU from the planes`counterweights+all the americium from countless smoke alarms is what caused the radiation spike.

[electric-amish]

Negative

Would leave Radio active debris.

E-A

[sammydogs64]

You guys are all LOOOOOOns mini nuke in the trade center, Come ON!!!!!

[decebal]

ammm i think it was that big airplane

[shades2]

Originally Posted by sammydogs64

You guys are all LOOOOOOns mini nuke in the trade center, Come ON!!!!!

It's almost funny isn't it.

Perhaps they have never seen the shockwave and flash result from a nuke test, even a mini-nuke would be far more spectacular than a simple building collapse.

Get a life, conspiracy morons.

[shades2]

Originally Posted by anythingsharp

There is too much to read+one needs to be an expert,but on the day of 911 in a few hrs after it happened I stuck a Geiger counter from the window of my Bronx apt and it registered over 30 counts/min.The background radiation in the most parts of NYC is between 10 and 20 counts,30 counts, while insignificant, has never been observed by me either before or after 911.Ground zero may very well have had 1000`s of counts/min.It could be explained by the massive amounts of dust in the air or???I used the Geiger counter on 911 because it looked like a micronuke to me right then and also I felt that something was amiss from the official story right as it was unfolding.My guess is that DU from the planes`counterweights+all the americium from countless smoke alarms is what caused the radiation spike.

Scary isn't it. I'm not sure planes that size (737s) are equipped with DU counterweights though, I would have to check, but there were probably many radiation sources in the building suddenly released to the atmosphere. I for one certainly wouldn't want to be breathing in that dust. Probably quite a bit of asbestos content too, dust of any form in the air is generally bad news and will spike radiation counters.

[Blair Munroe]

Matt you're such a card

[Large Sarge]

Remember there was a janitor in the basement, he barely escaped the demolition, he had some serious burns.

Seems to me if it was a mini-nuke he would show different (radiation ) burns versus standard heat burns.

I think his name was Rodriguez.

BTW

Parts of Matt's story above do make me wonder, there were cars that were reported flying around and blowing up (on live cameras), I do not see Thermate doing that.